[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Question for all candidates about their Plattform pages

On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:25:49AM +0100, Jutta Wrage wrote:
> In all other plattforms there are only minor validation problems that  
> can be corrected easily without making a noticible difference. But as  
> far as I can see, none of the pages really was valid HTML strict 


seems to say mine's "Valid HTML 4.01 Strict!". If it is, Manoj should
probably take credit for that -- I just took my text, added some <h2>'s,
<h3>'s, <p>'s and some <b> tags, he added all the stylesheets.

> and  
> none (or nearly none) uses semantic tags only, which would be better  
> for people who can "see" only the text content.

I always tend to use <b> and <i> instead of <strong> and <em> because they're
shorter to type and I've never seen any reason for them to be anything other
than aliases, no matter how the page is presented.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: