Re: GFDL position statement ballot invalid
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 16:35 +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Oliver Elphick <email@example.com> writes:
> > Nevertheless, no foundation document is actually being changed.
> > Therefore either this is a new foundation document, which requires a
> > change to the constitution, or it does not require a supermajority.
> The clause being changed by choice number 3 is clause number 10. It
> would add a new license that the project definitely considers to be
> free. There, happy? :)
Then the amendment needs to contain text to say so:
E.g: Amend the DFSG clause 10 to read:
The "GPL", "GFDL", "BSD", and "Artistic" licenses are examples
of licenses that we consider "free".
Oliver Elphick firstname.lastname@example.org
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/A54310EA 92C8 39E7 280E 3631 3F0E 1EC0 5664 7A2F A543 10EA
Do you want to know God? http://www.lfix.co.uk/knowing_god.html