[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GFDL position statement ballot invalid

On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 16:35 +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk> writes:
> > Nevertheless, no foundation document is actually being changed.
> > Therefore either this is a new foundation document, which requires a
> > change to the constitution, or it does not require a supermajority.
> The clause being changed by choice number 3 is clause number 10. It
> would add a new license that the project definitely considers to be
> free. There, happy? :)

Then the amendment needs to contain text to say so:

E.g: Amend the  DFSG clause 10 to read:

        The "GPL", "GFDL", "BSD", and "Artistic" licenses are examples
        of licenses that we consider "free".

Oliver Elphick                                          olly@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight                              http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/A54310EA  92C8 39E7 280E 3631 3F0E  1EC0 5664 7A2F A543 10EA
   Do you want to know God?   http://www.lfix.co.uk/knowing_god.html

Reply to: