Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
Nick Phillips <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Certainly looks like you think that there is some absolute way to
> determine that the license is not DFSG-compliant to me. If there
> isn't, then the "if" in the first part of your sentence is never
> satisfied, and the rest is completely hypothetical.
Wrong. Stating a hypothetical does not imply that I have some
"absolute way" to determine whether the antecedent is satisfied.