[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Anton's amendment



Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 07:41:45PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:38:25PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 10:20:31AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> > > I have not yet seen such an interpretation of this sort, in which
>> > > explanation and analysis of similar cases and such is proffered.  This
>> > > does not mean it cannot be done, but it has not.  
>> > 
>> > This interpretation is not ad-hoc thing and I strongly belive that it
>> > represents not only my view but also the view of FSF.
>> 
>> Again, the view of the FSF is of no relevance to the Debian project.
>
> Notice that in the message you cited I didn't claim that this view is
> the right view.  I only claimed that it is not ad-hoc thing.

The "FSF view" is not an interpretation of the DFSG *at all*.



Reply to: