On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 06:17:57PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes: > > The release team has spoken, and they decide what goes in a > > release. If they have decided, under advice from debian-legal, that > > GFDL docs are RC bugs, then that is that. > I've now also found: > <http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation> > which is basically the statement that I had been looking for. > Given that, I'm not sure that a GR is really necessary, although I still > don't think it could hurt. I'm in favor of a GR because it gives us the means of measuring the consensus within the project about *what* makes this a non-free license; the release team is convinced that it's not a Free Software license, but I'd rather have broad agreement about what *would* make it a free license before we start telling people they need to change. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature