Re: Question for candidate Robinson
Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> wrote:
> Marco subscribes to the notion that the DFSG was originally only meant
> to apply to ELF binaries, and anything else is de jure free. Anybody
> who says different, including anybody who was around at the time, can
> be dismissed as a 'revisionist'.
Marco d'Itri appears to support the "DFSG as a religion" concept.
I don't mind disagreeing with people, but it's very frustrating
to have self-appointed zealots constantly sniping. Even self-
appointed zealots joining in discussions are a bit better.
It often has not been possible to include Marco d'Itri's view in
consensus because he seems to simply contradict others without
explanation. I think he is just reading the list to gather blog
flamebait.
Reply to: