On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 12:36 -0600, Greg Norris wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:41:34AM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > > Just to formalize what I've already said... > > > > I think this should be considered for future -private content even if > > the GR Proposal 2 (which I second) is rejected, considering one argument > > against it is that people didn't expect to have it's private posts > > revealed. > > > > -- > > > > Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that the process > > defined in GR Proposal 2 will be applied *only* for the future content > > of debian-private mailing list. > > > > -- > > > > To me, it's a second option that would make possible to avoid creating > > more un-declassificable material on -private even if the GR Proposal 2 > > is rejected. > > > > daniel > > I second this proposal. I also second this proposal. John
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part