Re: DPL election IRC Debate - Call for questions
I know I've caused a lot of controversy with this issue but I keep
reapproaching it only because I feel its so important and that we are still
failing to address the issue with the proper level of seriousness (ie.
completely and permanently solved).
So... Dead horse... Kick. Kick. Kick.
Q: In June of 2004 it became apparent that SPI had been having deep set
responsibilities executing its chartered task. Donations equal to roughly
half of Debian's total holdings did not make their way into the project's
accounts due to poor (or non-existant) bookkeeping procedures. This failure
reflected poorly on Debian when donors have to correct the accounting errors
introduced. No typical business or professional organization can tolerate
this type of performance in a mission critical area. As a DPL candidate, what
actions will you take to insure that Debian's funds and other property are
managed in a professional manner? How will you insure successful execution?
On Monday 28 February 2005 3:29 am, Helen Faulkner wrote:
> As you probably know, the 2005 Debian Project Leader elections will
> involve an IRC debate, to be chaired by Martin Krafft and myself.
>
> The exact format and time of the debate have not been finalised, though
> the debate will obviously be held during the campaign period (ie before
> March 21st) and the format will probably be broadly similar to those in
> previous years. The details will be finalised soon and announced to
> this list.
>
> We would therefore like to call for suggestions for questions to be put
> to the candidates during the debate. We hope to be able to choose a set
> of questions which reflect the concerns and interests of Debian
> Developers in general.
>
> You are welcome to either post suggested questions to this list, or to
> email myself and/or Martin privately with your suggestions. If you wish
> your questions to be anonymous, please email us privately and make that
> clear.
--
Ean Schuessler, CTO
ean@brainfood.com
214-720-0700 x 315
Brainfood, Inc.
http://www.brainfood.com
Reply to: