Re: Discussions in Debian

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Discussions in Debian
From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:05:08 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040625050508.GB3542@cloud.net.au>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-vote@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040625042527.GB2379@suffields.me.uk>
References: <[🔎] 871xkc3fy2.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <[🔎] 20040619131114.GA27284@suffields.me.uk> <[🔎] 20040624011339.GB24509@suffields.me.uk> <[🔎] 20040624040826.GA28339@cloud.net.au> <[🔎] 20040625042527.GB2379@suffields.me.uk>

On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 05:25:28AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> [You have quite neatly just demonstrated what "argumentum ad hominem"
> actually is, though].

Do you have that phrase on a macro key yet? 

Bored,
Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Discussions in Debian
  - From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>

References:
- First Call for votes: General resolution: Sarge Release Schedule in view of GR 2004-003
  - From: Debian Project Secretary <secretary@debian.org>
- Analysis of the ballot options
  - From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Discussions in Debian
  - From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: Discussions in Debian
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: Discussions in Debian
  - From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: What your ballot should look like if you're in favor of releasing sarge
Next by Date: Re: What your ballot should look like if you're in favor of releasing sarge
Previous by thread: Re: Discussions in Debian
Next by thread: Re: Discussions in Debian
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread