Re: Analysis of the ballot options

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Analysis of the ballot options
From: "Eike \"zyro\" Sauer" <eikes@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:30:37 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] cb62r0$i8n$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] 871xkc3fy2.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <[🔎] 20040619131114.GA27284@suffields.me.uk> <[🔎] cb1fg1$emt$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20040619184831.GC2521@suffields.me.uk> <[🔎] 873c4qotwy.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <[🔎] 20040620223247.GA3367@suffields.me.uk>

Andrew Suffield schrieb:
> Nonsense. There is generally nothing to discuss, and where there is,
> it was settled a long time ago. 

If "long time ago" was before the last GR - situation has changed since
then.

Ciao,
                Eike

Reply to:

References:
- First Call for votes: General resolution: Sarge Release Schedule in view of GR 2004-003
  - From: Debian Project Secretary <secretary@debian.org>
- Analysis of the ballot options
  - From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: Analysis of the ballot options
  - From: "Eike \"zyro\" Sauer" <eikes@cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Re: Analysis of the ballot options
  - From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: Analysis of the ballot options
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: Analysis of the ballot options
  - From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Analysis of the ballot options
Next by Date: Re: Analysis of the ballot options
Previous by thread: Re: Analysis of the ballot options
Next by thread: Re: Analysis of the ballot options
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread