On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:00:58AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 10:59:44AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > Andreas made an ill-formed proposal which the project secretary
> > > rejected for this ballot, and refused all suggestions about how it
> > > should be properly formed. He appears to hold a grudge, I'm not sure
> > > why.
> >
> > Ah, never retain from a ad-hominem attacks, eh?
>
> Oh, come on. That was not an argument, therefore it cannot *possibly*
> be an instance of argumentum ad hominem.
Andreas didn't say "argument", he said "attack".
This is a tangent, though. Let's cut it.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature