Re: Proposal G
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:27:58AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> However, as the 3:1-majority is needed anyways(*), I don't mind to add
> something like:
> In the opinion of the Secretary, this proposal overrules the social
> contract, and needs therefor a 3:1-majority. In the opinion of the
> proponent, it doesn't overrules the social contract, but just put more
> siginficance on the interests of our users (as in SC #4).
When there's a dispute about the constitution (and the 3:1 majority issue
is a constitutional thing), the secretary chooses the right
interpretation.
(http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution, search for "interpret")
--
Raul
Reply to: