Re: Proposal - Deferment of Changes from GR 2004-003
* Raul Miller (moth@debian.org) [040528 19:25]:
> On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:38:47PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > While we're on the subject of interpretations, the first clause ("The
> > Debian project resolves that it will not compromise on freedom")
> > constitutes a position statement about an issue of the day, under
> > 4.1.5. Anybody who tries to give it a stronger meaning is invited to
> > stop being a dick.
>
> That meaning is plenty strong as it is.
>
> "Position of the day statements can overrule foundation documents if
> they achieve a 3:1 majority" seems to be a valid interpetation of the
> constitution.
"... if they achive a 3:1 majority and tell that they (might) overrule
a foundation document".
Reason: Please be specific what you want. As long as a GR doesn't say
that it might touch a foundation document, it doesn't do.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: