[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Analysis of the ballot options

> > Ah, never retain from a ad-hominem attacks, eh?

On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:00:58AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Oh, come on. That was not an argument, therefore it cannot *possibly*
> be an instance of argumentum ad hominem.

How is missing the point of what he said relevant?


Reply to: