[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Analysis of the ballot options

On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 05:31:33PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I would point out that historically, Debian does not release before it
> > is ready, and that's why our releases usually work so well. Option 3
> > is the "release before it is ready, because releasing is more
> > important than being ready" option. Option 6 is the "better rather
> > than sooner" option.
> Non sequitur - the premise is vaguely correct, but I disagree that the two
> conclusions follow from it. It doesn't make sense to me that readiness and
> usability of Debian releases are to be achieved by removing stuff that
> was not supposed to be removed just a while ago.

Only if you take it as a given that the old release policy was
correct. Otherwise it's just that heads have been forcibly removed
from the sand now.

  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: