[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Call for Vote on GR 2004-004

On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:34:12PM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> >    5. All other proposed GRs to get the sarge out are better than the 
> > situation created by GR (2004-003). But they still seem to put heavy 
> > limitations on the post-sarge releases. This proposal solves them for 
> > good.

> This is now incorrect.

Proposal F is not a proposal (in order) to get sarge out.

> > Proposal F:

> > The Debian project resolves that it will not compromise on freedom, and 
> > will never knowingly issue another release (excluding point updates to 
> > stable releases) that contains anything in the main or contrib sections 
> > which is not free software according to the DFSG. 

> Did any proponent of "Proposal F" showed us any valid exit path or
> rationarized Sarge release issues or they told us "I do not care about
> *release*". 

I think they told us exactly what is written in the amendment.  You may
draw your own conclusions about their intents, but as we've seen from GR
003, it's the wording that we're voting on, not "intent".

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: