Re: Proposal F on the ballot now.
> > Does that mean non-free must be empty for Sarge?
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:40:25AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> You're impliing that, under your interpretation of the SC, non-free is part
> of Debian. This interpretation would make the SC contradict itself, and
> bring us to the silly situation in which a position statement that merely
> reaffirms the SC is actualy violating it.
Being a part of the debian archives doesn't mean that something is a
part of the debian [operating/application/...] system.
Otherwise, for example, the part of our archives which hold list traffic
would need release management.