Re: Ready to vote on 2004-003?
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 11:46:27AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Hypocrisy would be if I professed one set of values and then acted on
> another, and I don't do that.
That is *EXACTLY* what you are doing.
you are saying that non-dfsg docs/fonts/firmware/etc must not be permitted
in debian, while at the same time insisting on an exception for mere
convenience.
that is the very definition of hypocrisy.
but neither honesty or ethics are your strong point, so i shouldn't be surprised
that you find that difficult to grasp.
if only you people would admit that you made a seriously stupid mistake when
you changed the SC without considering the consequences, then this problem
would be easily solved. but saving face is more important than fixing the
problem, and hypocrisy is much easier than admitting you were wrong (especially
if you do enough hand-waving to insist that it isn't hypocrisy).
craig
--
craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
The next time you vote, remember that "Regime change begins at home"
Reply to: