Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
Bill Allombert <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Unfortunately, none of the proposals so far address this issue directly,
> but instead propose to modify again the SC, which is not something I
> feel comfortable with.
Manoj's proposal does not propose to do this, but instead enacts
comprehensive guidelines to control all such changes now and in the
future. For this reason, I support his as the cleanest and most
well-considered and far-reaching option. This is the one that I
therefore intend to rank first.
Like your proposal, it issues a new statement, but unlike yours, works
for the future cleanly and prevents the need to revisit the issue