[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 12:21:17PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 3 May 2004 17:28:43 +0100, Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk> said: 
> > Some other comments:
> >  * Our Secretary seems to be under the impression that a vote must
> >    be started within a certain period of a resolution being
> >    proposed.  I don't think this is the case.  The discussion period
> >    quoted in 4.2(4) is a _minimum_.  According to A.2(1), it is up
> >    to the proposer or a sponsor to call for a vote, and there is no
> >    need to hold a vote until they do so.
>         Rubbish. In the case of the last GR, the sponsor had already
>  called for a vote (twice, in fact, I asked that the vote be delayed
>  the first time for for technical vote taking rasons, and he agreed). 

I don't see the disagreement here. Ian says the secretary need not hold
a vote until the proposer or sponsor calls for one. Manoj says the
proposer had indeed called for one.

Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>

Reply to: