Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 12:21:17PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 3 May 2004 17:28:43 +0100, Ian Jackson <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> > Some other comments:
> > * Our Secretary seems to be under the impression that a vote must
> > be started within a certain period of a resolution being
> > proposed. I don't think this is the case. The discussion period
> > quoted in 4.2(4) is a _minimum_. According to A.2(1), it is up
> > to the proposer or a sponsor to call for a vote, and there is no
> > need to hold a vote until they do so.
> Rubbish. In the case of the last GR, the sponsor had already
> called for a vote (twice, in fact, I asked that the vote be delayed
> the first time for for technical vote taking rasons, and he agreed).
I don't see the disagreement here. Ian says the secretary need not hold
a vote until the proposer or sponsor calls for one. Manoj says the
proposer had indeed called for one.
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>