Re: Amendment to the Constitution: Add a new foundation document
On Sun, 2 May 2004 23:17:07 +0200, Michael Banck <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 01:15:33PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On consultation with the other sponsors, I have decided to add a
>> sunset clause to the proposed "Transition Guide", so that the
>> specific references to Sarge are ex-purged after it is released.
> Great. I've just got one question: Have you considered merging the
> essence of this document into the constitution? This would save us
> from adding another foundation document, but it might enlarge the
> constitution somewhat depending on how terse we could formulate
I considered it, but not for long. I can't write in the same
manner as the constitution is written -- I gelt that a transition
guide line, since it is a guide, not a set of rigid, well defined
delineation of powers and jurisdictions, required a more verbose
handling than the constitution has.
I don't think terseness is a virtue when we are trying to
define a generic set of guiding principles anyway.
My mind is making ashtrays in Dayton ...
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C