Re: Proposal - Deferment of Changes from GR 2004-003
On 2004-04-28 04:26:53 +0100 Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
I can't believe, from following this list, that the reason
the previous GR failed to be fixed was because the discussion period
cut short in the midst of serious progress.
Irrelevant. The previous GR was discussed for some time, in draft and
final forms. Yours has just appeared, dropped from the sky.
I am not particularly interested in providing a comprehensive list of
ballot options to cover all possible views of DDs, here.
You are not interested in anything besides "back me or smack me"?
If you believe this particular proposal is
ill-considered or wrong, please see paragraph one.
So what? I expect you to reject amendments and refuse to incorporate
them, given your stated view.
My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing