[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC

Craig Sanders wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:05:57PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> This would clarify the main point that has been spawning endless attempts
>> by occasional maintainers to sneak non-free stuff into "main".
> what "endless attempts" would these be?  have there been any incidents in
> the real world (i.e. outside of your fevered imagination)?

Oh, let's see, "firmware" in the kernel, GFDL docs, boot sectors, RFCs, and
that's off the top of my head.  Mindi/mondo (which contained, among other
things, pico).   Those enough "incidents" for you?

> you bigots lost the vote (you didn't even come close) - can't you please
> just
> shut up and go away?
Um, I have nothing against having "non-free", I'm against having non-free
stuff in "main".  Hello?!?  Not the same thing.

>  do you really have to try to continue the
> "discussion", by any desperate means possible?
> craig

Make sure your vote will count.

Reply to: