[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GR: Editorial amendments to the social contract



Michael Banck wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 01:21:33AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Raul Miller wrote:
>> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:27:34PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> 
>> >> No, trust me, we parsed this one very carefully and took an excessive
>> >> amount of time on this in debian-legal.  There are two possible
>> >> interpretations, but both come out to an "and".
>  
>> > That's so bogus I don't know where to start.
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

>> Start by learning English better?
> 
> I would be *really* grateful if you could limit /this/ discussion to
> something civil.
> 
> So either drop your usual insults or drop -vote from your mailbox.
I presume this is addressed to Raul, for his insulting statement above?

Given that most of the rest of my message was devoted to explaining
precisely why his "and/or" interpretation was impossible for someone with
sufficient understanding of English, I think my comment was actually
appropriate and to-the-point.

-- 
Make sure your vote will count.
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/



Reply to: