Re: "keep non-free" proposal
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: "keep non-free" proposal
- From: MJ Ray <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:03:11 +0000
- Message-id: <email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <20040313143621.GA11652@lambda>
On 2004-03-13 14:36:21 +0000 Sven Luther <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 10:33:32AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
On 2004-03-12 22:49:26 +0000 Sven Luther <email@example.com>
The wrong list though, as i understand, this should be better suited
Maybe you don't. The question was sent to a list, not just you
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:02:53PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
It seems reasonable to ask whether the maintainer can just close
>>ignore >>the bug as invalid before N people file M bugs against
non-free with >>apparent replacements in main.
And, how should i know ?
I don't understand you. You claim that the question is not worth
asking and when I point out why it is, you speak bureaucracy.
Personally, I think questioning a suggested way to bypass a current GR
vote are probably on-topic for -vote. Don't start claiming otherwise
just because you want it on a list that you don't read.
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ firstname.lastname@example.org
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/