[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section

> > It's impossible to enforce a "STFU about it" option.

On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:51:49AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> similarly, it's impossible to enforce a "Further Discussion" option yet it's
> there on the ballot.


Maybe it would be clearer if you prefixed that with "Allow for".  Even
more if you consider that this is a part of a decision making process.

Futher Discussion allows for further discussion before any binding
decisions are made.

Does it make sense to talk about allowing people to shut up?  Does it
make more sense to talk about allowing people to shut up before decisions
are made?

> and just in case you miss the point of this message: some of us are sick to
> death of this topic.  

So what?

If you don't like reading about it, don't.  Unsubscribe from the list(s).
Killfile its threads.  Stop writing about it.

Or, if you prefer, carry on melodramatically about how other people are
so cruel to you...


Reply to: