Re: Proposal: Call 'amendments' 'alternatives'
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 02:43:03PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:11:27 -0500, Nathanael Nerode <email@example.com> said:
> > This would eliminate confusion such as that from Ted Ts'o in
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200402/msg00135.html.
> > It also fits the English-language meaning better.
> What if the amendment is really an amendment, and not an
> alternative, unlike the current case?
Maybe we should have both ?