[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GR status

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:44:25 +0000, MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com> said: 

> Modifying the amendment to delete part or all of the original
> proposal does not seem to be one of the Secretary's powers, or do
> you consider wording just a matter of procedure? If the amendment
> wishes to delete things, *it should say so*, as previous amendments
> have.

	Hmm. Sorry, I am going to continue to assume that debian
 developers can exercise a modicum of common sense. If option 1 says
 (no longer provide non-free), and option 2 says (reaffirm our
 intention to supply non-free), I assume people know what that means
 -- or I a certainly do not want them having a say in where the
 project is headed.

Raffiniert ist der Herrgott aber boshaft ist er nicht. Albert Einstein
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: