Re: Proposal: Keep non-free
* Michael Banck (email@example.com) [040226 11:10]:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 10:34:02AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Because most probably, nobody will build ftp.non-free.org. I would be
> > happy to be proven the contrary though, and once such an alternative
> > structure is up, and works in an acceptable way, then i would see no
> > opposition to move non-free to it.
> hear, hear.
I still don't see the advantage of the move, but I don't really mind.
However, in this case, the proposal should say something like: "The
non-free software that was distributed via Debians archive is now
moved to ..., and the clause 5 of the SC is dropped."
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C