Re: resounding nothingness
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:05:11AM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 03:52, Raul Miller wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:31:36PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > I am confused. Did not several people second earlier versions of your,
> > > and others', proposals?
> > The most any proposal got was 4 seconds. Five would be needed to
> > introduce an amendment.
> Really? I count 6 seconds of Andrew Suffield's proposal of Jan 10
> Scott James Remnant <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Kyle McMartin <email@example.com>
> Clint Adams <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Tore Anderson <email@example.com>
> Michael Banck <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Branden Robinson <email@example.com>
> This was the proposal for a GR to simply remove non-free without making
> an amendment to the Social Contract.
Yeah, but Raul's proposal is something else.