[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GR: Editorial amendments to the social contract



Seconded as amended.

On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 03:12:32PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 03:35:01PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 03:49:39PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > Haven't had any further comments, so I guess we're good to go. This
> > > proposal corrects various linguistic errors, and updates the language
> > > of the social contract so that it better reflects reality and the
> > > original intent.
> > 
> > 
> > > 2. We will give back to the free software community
> > 
> > Nitpick:  I believe Free Software should be capitalized here and in
> > paragraph 4 below, as this is a reference to a named concept and not a
> > mere juxtaposition of the English words.
> 
> That's really pushing the limits. But fair enough; let my proposal
> stand amended such that all occurances of "free software" are replaced
> with "Free Software". This modifies three of the paragraph headings
> (2, 3, and 5) and one instance in paragraph 4.
> 
> This is a typographical correction under paragraph A.1.6 of the
> constitution; seconds are not required providing nobody objects.
> 
> ["Free Software" in the titles fell victim to my elimination of the
> ucfirst stuff; it was always wrong in paragraph 4]
> 
> > > When we write new components of the Debian system, we will license
> > > them in a manner consistent with the Debian Free Software Guidelines.
> > > We will make the best system we can, so that free works will be widely
> > > distributed and used.  We will communicate things such as bug fixes,
> > > improvements and user requests to the "upstream" authors of works
> > > included in our system.
> > 
> > > 3. We will not hide problems
> > 
> > > We will keep our entire bug report database open for public view at
> > > all times. Reports that people file online will promptly become visible
> > > to others.
> > 
> > Nitpick: on-line, not online
> 
> Others have responded to this and I concur; "online" is preferred. I
> think we've actually had this discussion before.
> 
> 
> As amended:
> 
> -----8<-----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Paragraphs 1 to 4 of the social contract are replaced with the
> following text:
> 
> 1. Debian will remain 100% free
> 
> We provide the guidelines that we use to determine if a work is "free"
> in the document entitled "The Debian Free Software Guidelines". We
> promise that the Debian system and all its components will be free
> according to these guidelines. We will support people who create or
> use both free and non-free works on Debian. We will never make the
> system require the use of a non-free component.
> 
> 2. We will give back to the Free Software community
> 
> When we write new components of the Debian system, we will license
> them in a manner consistent with the Debian Free Software Guidelines.
> We will make the best system we can, so that free works will be widely
> distributed and used.  We will communicate things such as bug fixes,
> improvements and user requests to the "upstream" authors of works
> included in our system.
> 
> 3. We will not hide problems
> 
> We will keep our entire bug report database open for public view at
> all times. Reports that people file online will promptly become visible
> to others.
> 
> 4. Our priorities are our users and Free Software
> 
> We will be guided by the needs of our users and the Free Software
> community. We will place their interests first in our priorities. We
> will support the needs of our users for operation in many different
> kinds of computing environments. We will not object to non-free works
> that are intended to be used on Debian systems, or attempt to charge a
> fee to people who create or use such works. We will allow others to
> create distributions containing both the Debian system and other
> works, without any fee from us. In furtherance of these goals, we will
> provide an integrated system of high-quality materials with no legal
> restrictions that would prevent such uses of the system.
> 
> 
> If paragraph 5 is still present, it is replaced with the following
> text:
> 
> 5. Works that do not meet our Free Software standards
> 
> We acknowledge that some of our users require the use of works that do
> not conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines. We have created
> "contrib" and "non-free" areas in our archive for these works. The
> packages in these areas are not part of the Debian system, although
> they have been configured for use with Debian. We encourage CD
> manufacturers to read the licenses of the packages in these areas and
> determine if they can distribute the packages on their CDs. Thus,
> although non-free works are not a part of Debian, we support their use
> and provide infrastructure for non-free packages (such as our bug
> tracking system and mailing lists).
> 
> -----8<-----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> A full breakdown of the changes is available at
> http://people.debian.org/~asuffield/social_contract_reform.3
> 
> -- 
>   .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
>  : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
>  `. `'                          |
>    `-             -><-          |



-- 
Chad Walstrom <chewie@wookimus.net>           http://www.wookimus.net/
           assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: