Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 05:55:42PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:43:53AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > in short it was a comment on the fact that most users really do not care
> > whether they are allowed to distribute modified versions or not,
> > because they have no intention of ever redistributing it.
> Unless they have friends, then they might care [because software that isn't
> redistributable is harder for their friends to get].
"friend, get a copy of the software from <there>, and <here> is my set of
no, it's not as good as free software. it's still useful, which is exactly my
point on that particular topic.