Re: [Proposal] Revised Social Contract
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 06:30:48PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > I submit that this was written without any consideration of the
> > > discussion following Branden's efforts earlier this year.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:39:30PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > That's a non-issue, as near as I can tell.
> >
> > If there's some problem you're trying to solve, please specify it,
> > perhaps by providing the unambiguous references to some place that
> > clearly describes these issues.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 08:57:14PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> I can't be bothered to fix your problems for you, or to describe how
> you can do it. I figured a hint as to how you could educate yourself
> was fair, though.
I'm not asking you to fix my problems.
I am asking you to identify what problems you're talking about.
For some reason, you have consistently been either unable or unwilling
to do.
As near as I can tell, you've totally misunderstood commentary by Anthony
Towns, have implemented broken support for that misunderstanding, and
are unhappy that I haven't followed your example.
But that's not my problem.
--
Raul
Reply to: