On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:17:56PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > Reading this carefully, it seems that your proposal does not conflict > with Dale E. Martin's rather constructive proposal from > <[🔎] 20040110164306.GA20639@clifton-labs.com>, namely to leave the actual > packages on our servers for a while, but only accessible via nonfree.org > and to remove every trace of non-free from debian.org from a user's > perspective (I hope I have summarized well. The absence of discussion > about this proposal so far seems to imply that people are generally not > averse to it) > > Any opinions on this (i.e. that those two proposals don't conflict) > assertion? I can't see why they would, much like a few other proposals along similar lines. It doesn't even conflict with most of the other things people have been suggesting. I don't expect we'd maintain this for very *long*, though. And it all depends on somebody caring enough about non-free to want to go to the trouble of keeping it around (I predict that in this scenario, its size would be greatly reduced). -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature