[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: summary of software licenses in non-free

On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 10:49:36PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 10:15:53PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > What about copyright.Debian, or copyright.DFSG ?
> That would be misleading I think.
> Why not add it to the copyright filer proper?

I can go one better. Include /usr/share/vrms/reasons/$package
containing a line like this:

$package: This package has a license which is full of shit

vrms will then show the reasons for packages being in non-free. This
was never really publicised when it was added because, well, vrms just
isn't maintained that much.

  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: