Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea

[Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>]

On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:51:24AM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> While "Don't respond to Craig Sanders" is usually a good idea, I feel
> compelled to point out to anybody casually watching that the parent
> post is pure FUD; read it with a critical mind and you should find the
> flaws. The first paragraph, for example, is entirely delusional.

ah, the first refuge of the incompetent and the bogus - you can't argue with
the points raised or the facts provided, so attack the person.  with any luck,
the disturbing content will be lost/forgotten in the ensuing flamewar.

craig