Re: GR: Removal of non-free
On Jan 2, 2004, at 01:38, Craig Sanders wrote:
I second this, with the following amendment:
s/this/Craig Sanders/
ObVote: no, I don't really second cas's "suggestion"
i'm sorry, i forgot to say "NOT!!!!"
any form of sarcasm or irony without such a subtle-as-a-sledgehammer
hint is
obviously beyond you.
Branden's "amendment" was clearly in jest.
i'll try to remember this in future, for the benefit of you and your
fellow
americans.
Branden, please keep up the witty remarks to leave Craig Sanders and
his fellow Australians dazed, confused, and lost, just as if they had
just been hit over the head with a sledgehammer.
For the Australians in the audience:
IOW, if you're going to dish out sarcastic amendments, don't
be offended when sarcastic ones are offered in return.
[ Sorry if this has offended people. As an American myself, I must
object to the characterization of /all/ Americans as incapable of
subtle humor; such a characterization is no more accurate than that
of the French as capable of nothing but surrender or that Irishmen
as perpetually drunk off their feet: These are only true for the
vast majority, not the entirety of their respective country.
I mean, really, somewhere there must be a sober Irishman! Sure, it
might only be due to his indefinite detainment by Ashcroft as a
"material witless," but that still counts, right? ]
Reply to: