Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting

[Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>]

On Nov 2, 2003, at 10:28, Raul Miller wrote:

> [2] (and chooses not to provide an option which includes the most 
> salient
> points of both),

You do realize that if we created a ballot with even 4 different 
orthogonal options with all combinations, our ballot would have 16[0] 
options on it? Add a firth, and you get 32, and so on. I think its a 
flaw in our voting system if we encourage our ballot to look like it 
needs the word "Made in California" stamped on it.

[0] ₄C₁ + ₄C₂ + ₄C₃ + ₄C₄ + 1 (further discussion). Hope the Unicode 
comes out.