On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:50:54PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > This whole discussion tells me that the original proposal (with > > Manoj's s/quorum/.../ change, for consistency) should be up to that > > task. > > Cool. All we need is the other sponsors to agree (though I > agree with the rationale behind the change, I do not feel strongly > enough to have to go through and campaign for a new set of sponsors; > if 5 of the original sponsors agree to the changes, I'll put them > in). > For my point of view there is no problem to the change, since it doesn't change the meaning of the proposal, but only clarifies it. Bye, Guido
Attachment:
pgpdFPSsubCzI.pgp
Description: PGP signature