Re: GR: Removal of non-free
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 04:53:09PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> The point is that perhaps the majority of project members no longer
> wish to include or support non-free.
If that's the case, then your refusal to talk about this as a part
of changing the social contract is very hard to understand. [As you
indicated, items 5 and 1 are both relevant here.]
In essence: "no longer wish to ... support non-free" makes this a
supermajority issue. There's no value at all in pretending other wise.
--
Raul
Reply to: