Re: RFD: amendment of Debian Social Contract
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:50:14 +0000, MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com> said:
> On 2003-11-09 03:56:10 +0000 moth@magenta.com wrote:
>> Alternatively, maybe people could second the draft at the bottom of
>> Anthony Towns' message:
> Why second something that was not proposed? It seems to be a
> hypothetical "if I were..." to give Branden something to think
> about.
Has anything been proposed at all so far? It seems to me that
various trial balloons have been sent up, but nothing has yet been
formally proposed (If I am wrong, could the interested parties send
me the message ID's of the proposals and the seconds? I have not been
keeping track as is my wont).
manoj
--
People who claim they don't let little things bother them have never
slept in a room with a single mosquito.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: