Re: RFD: amendment of Debian Social Contract
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:16:54 -0500, Branden Robinson <email@example.com> said:
> No, you're wrong. The mechanism for achieving large-scale archive
> changes isn't presently formally defined at all. Informally, it
> appears to be the exclusive domain of the Debian Archive
> Administrators (who, the last time I checked, were not official
> delegates of the Debian Project Leader).
>  The last time I asked, I got no answer. It's possible the DPL
> made a delegation without announcing it to debian-devel-announce.
So, the proscription in the SC is the only thing that stands
between an admins whim to remove non-free?
All most men really want in life is a wife, a house, two kids and a
car, a cat, no maybe a dog. Ummm, scratch one of the kids and add a
dog. Definitely a dog.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C