[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GR: Disambiguation of Section 4.1.5 of the constitution



Hi,

Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> 	I am appending the proposal, and the amendment, to this mail
>  message.

I second the proposal and the amendment.

> ======================================================================
>  4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
>
>    4.1. Powers
>
>     Together, the Developers may:
>      1. Appoint or recall the Project Leader.
>      2. Amend this constitution, provided they agree with a 3:1 majority.
>      3. Override any decision by the Project Leader or a Delegate.
>      4. Override any decision by the Technical Committee, provided they
>         agree with a 2:1 majority.
> -    5. Issue nontechnical policy documents and statements.
> -       These include documents describing the goals of the project, its
> -       relationship with other free software entities, and nontechnical
> -       policies such as the free software licence terms that Debian
> -       software must meet.
> -       They may also include position statements about issues of the day.
> +    5. Issue, modify and withdraw nontechnical policy documents and
> statements. +       These include documents describing the goals of the
> project, its +       relationship with other free software entities, and
> nontechnical +       policies such as the free software licence terms that
> Debian +       software must meet.
> +       They may also include position statements about issues of the day.
> +   5.1 A special clause applies to the documents labelled as
> +       "Foundation Documents". These documents are those
> +       that are deemed to be critical to the core of the project,
> +       they tend to define what the project is, and lay the
> +       foundations of its structure. The developers may
> +       modify a foundation document provided they agree with a 3:1
> +       majority.
>
> +   5.2 Initially, the list of foundation Documents consists
> +       of this document, The Debian Constitution, as well as the
> +       documents known as the Debian Social Contract and the
> +       Debian Free Software Guidelines. The list of the documents
> +       that are deemed to be "Foundation Documents" may be changed
> +       by the developers provided they agree with a 3:1 majority.
>      6. Together with the Project Leader and SPI, make decisions about
>         property held in trust for purposes related to Debian. (See
>         s.9.1.)
>
> ======================================================================
>  Rationale: The clause being modified has been seen to be quite
>  ambiguous. Since the original wording appeared to be amenable to two
>  wildly different interpretations, this change adds clarifying the
>  language in the constitution about _changing_ non technical
>  documents. Additionally, this also provides for the core documents of
>  the project the same protection against hasty changes that the
>  constitution itself enjoys.
> ======================================================================
>
> ######################################################################
> ######################################################################
> ######################################################################
>
> > +   5.2 Initially, the list of foundation Documents consists
> > +       of this document, The Debian Constitution, as well as the
> > +       documents known as the Debian Social Contract and the
> > +       Debian Free Software Guidelines. The list of the documents
> > +       that are deemed to be "Foundation Documents" may be changed
> > +       by the developers provided they agree with a 3:1 majority.
>
> +   5.2 The list of foundation Documents consists
> +       of this document, The Debian Constitution, as well as the
> +       documents known as the Debian Social Contract and the
> +       Debian Free Software Guidelines. The list of the documents
> +       that are deemed to be "Foundation Documents" may be changed
> +       by the developers only by changing this clause, which needs
> +       according to 5.1 a 3:1 majority.
>
> Advantage: This makes the list in 5.2 the authoritative list, which
> makes it easier later to see which documents are in fact foundation
> Documents. (Or to speak in computer slang: normalization of data.)
>
>
> --
> Economists are still trying to figure out why the girls with the least
> principle draw the most interest.
> Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org> 
> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07
> E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493
> 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

-- 
Matthias Urlichs    |    {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de     |    smurf@debian.org
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.debian.net
 - -
What does an Englishman's stepladder say at the top? STOP HERE.

Attachment: pgpf8h4VucrDj.pgp
Description: signature


Reply to: