[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: First call for votes: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying GR



Hello Manoj,

On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:43:34PM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> This vote is being conducted in accordance to the Debian Constitution, 
> Section A, Standard Resolution Procedure, to vote on ...
> 
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> [   ] Choice 1: Clone Proof SSD Condorcet Amendment
> [   ] Choice 2: None Of The Above
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

The default option is the wrong one, isn't it.

Our constitution states:

    4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
      [...]
      4.2. Procedure
        1. The Developers follow the Standard Resolution Procedure, below.
           [...]
        4. [..] There is a quorum of 3Q.

    A. Standard Resolution Procedure
      [...]
      A.3. Voting procedure
        [...]
        5. [...] If a quorum is required then the default option is
           Further Discussion.

So the default option should be "Further Discussion".
Actually this would even make more sense then Choice 2 above.
I would suggest to send out a corrected call for votes.

Jochen
-- 
                                         Omm
                                      (0)-(0)
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/index.html

Attachment: pgpQ8b7ATYDOm.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: