Re: Better quorum change proposal, with justification
- To: Nathanael Nerode <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Better quorum change proposal, with justification
- From: Sven Luther <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 19:01:00 +0200
- Message-id: <20030525170100.GA7470@iliana>
- In-reply-to: <20030524232753.GA1873@doctormoo>
- References: <20030524232753.GA1873@doctormoo>
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 07:27:53PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Here's the nightmare scenario, under Manoj's amendment, which I think
> John Robinson may have been trying to come up with. Consider two options,
> A and B, and the default option D. Let the quorum requirement R=20.
> 39 people show up to vote. These are their preferences (most prefered
> on the left, = denotes two equally preferred options).
This is maybe a bit naive, but would not just saying that the default option
cannot be equally preferred to another option solve this problems, and any
other like it that were raised here ?