Re: General Resolution draft against spam.

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: General Resolution draft against spam.
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 01:06:51 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87wuoh38g4.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021017010431.GA9962@kitenet.net> (Joey Hess's message of "Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:04:31 -0400")
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.44.0210161748350.13305-314159@cantor.unex.es> <[🔎] 20021017010431.GA9962@kitenet.net>

Hi,

        I am against this proposal as well. W should not be making
 things harder for legitimate users, treating them as acceptable
 collateral damage in the war on spam. Spam filtering works; and people
 who still have a problem should investigate
 http://crm114.sourceforge.net/ for an excellent tool.

	manoj
-- 
 He who laughs last hasn't been told the terrible truth.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: General Resolution draft against spam.
  - From: Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>

References:
- General Resolution draft against spam.
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- Re: General Resolution draft against spam.
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: RFD: Reviving Constitutional amendment: Smith/Condorcet vote tallying
Next by Date: Re: RFD: Reviving Constitutional amendment: Smith/Condorcet vote tallying
Previous by thread: Re: General Resolution draft against spam.
Next by thread: Re: General Resolution draft against spam.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread