Hi,
Raul Miller:
> Once again, I highly recommend that we pay attention to the criteria
> documented at http://www.electionmethods.org. In particular, monotonicity
Note that electionmethods.org is biased towards Condorcet. There are a
bunch of other criteria.
See for example http://www.barnsdle.demon.co.uk/vote/aprove.html
See http://www.google.de/search?q=+site:www.sam.sdu.dk+condorcet+approval
for a couple of scientific papers. I've not had time to do more than skim
these, but at least one analyzes the question of which of these criteria
is actually important in practice.
--
Matthias Urlichs | noris network AG | http://smurf.noris.de/
--
Depends on how you define "always". :-)
-- Larry Wall in <199710211647.JAA17957@wall.org>
Attachment:
pgpM9R3zc18XW.pgp
Description: PGP signature