On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 03:03:33AM +1100, Clinton Mead wrote: > Consistancy Criteria - "If election X and election Y have identical > votes and supermajority requirements, and election X has a default > option of A, and election Y has a default option of B, and B is the > winner of election X, then B must be the winner of election Y." This criterion doesn't really make any sense: the default option doesn't change, it's always "further discussion" or "none of the above". It's just not meaningful to say "consider the same votes when X is the default option instead of Y". Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Attachment:
pgpKFACHkBEIL.pgp
Description: PGP signature