[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: supermajority options

* Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> [021120 11:36]:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:54:30PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > [1] The simplest: discard supermajority entirely.  Nothing special is
> > required to override "important decisions".  This has some elegantly
> > simple mathematical properties but I don't know of any other argument
> > for it.
> I support this.  I'd rather see whether or not we screw up in the
> absence of supermajority requirements instead of just assuming that we
> will.

<AOL />

Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org> KC0OBS http://www.ringworld.org/

"Many voters assume that their political leaders are hard at work on
                    these issues. They are not."
  _Editorial: Time to choose / Who will deliver on transportation?_

Attachment: pgpdI963C7BCX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: