Hello,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:12:03PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:54:30PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > [1] The simplest: discard supermajority entirely. Nothing special is
> > required to override "important decisions". This has some elegantly
> > simple mathematical properties but I don't know of any other argument
> > for it.
>
> I support this. I'd rather see whether or not we screw up in the
> absence of supermajority requirements instead of just assuming that we
> will.
I agree with this,
Jochen
--
Omm
(0)-(0)
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/privat.html
Attachment:
pgp56y4SZW3Ku.pgp
Description: PGP signature